4.8 Article

DNA-encoded library versus RNA-encoded library selection enables design of an oncogenic noncoding RNA inhibitor

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2114971119

Keywords

RNA; drug design; nucleic acids; RNA folding

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 CA249180, R01 GM120491, R35 GM140890]
  2. Myotonic US fellowship research grant
  3. National Ataxia Foundation fellowship research grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nature evolves molecular interaction networks through persistent perturbation and selection, presenting a stark contrast to the current drug discovery process. By recapitulating nature's search paradigm in a screen of a DNA-encoded library against a library of RNA structures, high-affinity and selective ligand-RNA interactions can be identified and their cellular engagements predicted.
Nature evolves molecular interaction networks through persistent perturbation and selection, in stark contrast to drug discovery, which evaluates candidates one at a time by screening. Here, nature's highly parallel ligand-target search paradigm is recapitulated in a screen of a DNA-encoded library (DEL; 73,728 ligands) against a library of RNA structures (4,096 targets). In total, the screen evaluated similar to 300 million interactions and identified numerous bona fide ligand-RNA three-dimensional fold target pairs. One of the discovered ligands bound a 5' GAG/3'CCC internal loop that is present in primary microRNA-27a (pri-miR-27a), the oncogenic precursor of microRNA-27a. The DEL-derived pri-miR-27a ligand was cell active, potently and selectively inhibiting pri-miR-27a processing to reprogram gene expression and halt an otherwise invasive phenotype in triple-negative breast cancer cells. By exploiting evolutionary principles at the earliest stages of drug discovery, it is possible to identify high-affinity and selective target-ligand interactions and predict engagements in cells that short circuit disease pathways in preclinical disease models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available