4.3 Article

Biconvective transport of magnetized couple stress fluid over a radiative paraboloid of revolution

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544089211072715

Keywords

MHD; catalytic surface; thermal radiation; couple stress fluid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the physical features of bioconvective MHD flow of couple stress fluid over an upper horizontal surface are analyzed, considering radiation and viscous dissipation effects. By solving ordinary differential equations numerically, the variations of velocity, temperature, concentration, friction factor, and local heat and mass transfer rates are observed. The results show that velocity decreases with increasing couple stress and magnetic parameter, while temperature increases. The thermal boundary layer increases with the Brinkman number, while the concentration boundary layer decreases.
In the present study, the physical features of the bioconvective MHD flow of a couple stress fluid over an upper horizontal surface (i.e. surface shaped like a submarine or any (uhsp) aerodynamical automobile) is analysed by considering radiation and viscous dissipation effects. In the fluid-saturated domain flow is induced due to the reaction of catalytic surface, double diffusion and stretching fluid layers. In fact, couple stress fluid is electrically conducted because non-uniform magnetic field is imposed. With the assistance of appropriate similarity transformations governing equations of the study are reduced to set of ordinary differential equations. Thereafter, built-in MATLAB solver bvp4c is implemented to solve the system numerically. By means of graphs and tables variations of the velocity, temperature, concentration, friction factor, local heat and mass transfer rates are observed thoroughly by varying the flow controlling parameters. From this analysis, main observations are, for rising values of couple stress and magnetic parameter velocity is decline, whereas temperature rises for the same parameters and increase in the thermal boundary layer is noted for the Brinkman number, whereas reverse trend is noted in the concentration boundary layer. Finally, comparison is done and a good correlation is identified between the present analysis and perversely recorded analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available