4.7 Article

Mixing simulation of cohesive particles in a soil mixer

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 399, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117218

Keywords

Soil mixer; Discrete element method; Particle mixing; Rotating shaft; Mixing index; Computational soil dynamics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52075188]
  2. Open fund of Fujian Key Laboratory of Automotive Electronics and Electric Drive [KF-X19001]
  3. Youth Innovation Fund of Xiamen City [2020FCX0125010]
  4. Project of Quanzhou Science and Technology [2021G05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the mixing of cohesive particles in a soil mixer using the discrete element method. The results show that the mixer is suitable for mixing cohesive particles, and a lower filling level and higher speed and size of the rotating shaft lead to better mixing efficiency.
Soil particle mixing is an important research hotspot in the emerging field of waste soil resources. In this study, the discrete element method (DEM) is used to characterize the mixing of cohesive particles in a soil mixer. To verify the mixing effect of this mixer on cohesive materials, the forces between the particles are simulated using a cohesive contact model. The effects of filling level, rotating shaft speed and size, particle cohesion and size on particle dynamics and mixing performance within the mixer are investigated. The mixing process of the particles is analyzed to quantify the mixing performance by using the coordination number (CN), average velocity, contact force network and mixing index. To assess the degree of mixing using the Lacey mixing index, a grid system is used to divide the mixing area so that the mixing index can be calculated. The results show that this mixer is suitable for mixing cohesive particles and that a lower filling level leads to better mixing efficiency. In addition, the mixing efficiency is significantly improved as the speed and size of the rotating shaft in the mixer increased. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available