4.7 Article

Inhibition effect of N2/CO2 blends on the minimum explosion concentration of agriculture and coal dusts

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 399, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117195

Keywords

CO2; Explosion criterion; Combustion kinetics; Inerting effect; Explosion characteristics

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung/Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The minimum explosion concentration (MEC) of three agriculture dusts and two coal dusts was studied to investigate the role of gaseous inhibitors. Both active and passive methods were used, and the thermal analysis tests were conducted to study the pyrolysis and combustion characteristics. An alternative explosion criterion based on combustion duration time was used to determine MEC, and the results were compared with the standardized overpressure method.
Minimum explosion concentration (MEC) of three agriculture dusts and two coal dusts was studied via a 20-L explosion chamber to reveal the role of gaseous inhibitors. Both active method (CO2 diluting air) and passive method (CO2 replacing O-2) were used. The TG and DTG thermal analysis tests were conducted to study the pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of dust samples. An alternative explosion criterion based on combustion duration time was used to determine MEC, and compared with the standardized overpressure method. Under 10-kJ ignition condition, as oxygen mole fraction (X-O2) decreased from 21% to 10%, MEC of agriculture dusts and coal dusts respectively increased by around 5 times and 2 times. The active inerting method with a lower N-2/CO2 ratio was found to have a better suppression effect on the explosion of the five carbonaceous dusts because the blend has a higher specific heat and a lower oxygen diffusion rate. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available