4.7 Article

Combined effect of particle size and surface cohesiveness on powder spreadability for additive manufacturing

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 392, Issue -, Pages 191-203

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.06.046

Keywords

Discrete element method; Particle size; Cohesion; Powder spreading; Additive manufacturing

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) MAPP Future Manufacturing Hub [EP/P006566/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a particle-scale study on the spreading of cohesive fine powders, revealing the effects of particle size and surface cohesiveness on spreading performance. The study identifies critical powder descriptors for defining spreading performance.
The dependence of powder flowability on particle cohesion can often be captured by a dimensionless Bond number, however, whether the same is true for powder spreadability remains unclear. This paper thus presents a particle-scale study on the spreading of cohesive fine powders for additive manufacturing, focusing on the combined effect of particle size and surface cohesiveness. With an experimental validated model, detailed analysis revealed two competing mechanisms due to geometrical constraint and interparticle cohesion. For small particles that allows multiple particles across blade clearance, layer homogeneity is largely maintained before deteriorating sharply, while for large particles that forming a mono-layered packing structure, an optimum homogeneity can be obtained at a moderate level of particle cohesion. The efficacy of increasing blade clearance to improve layer quality was also evaluated. This study can help to identify a critical set of powder descriptors that defines spreading performance. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available