4.7 Article

Modification of high-volume fly ash cement with metakaolin for its utilization in cemented paste backfill: The effects of metakaolin content and particle size

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 393, Issue -, Pages 539-549

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.067

Keywords

Fly ash; Compressive strength; Cemented paste backfill; Metakaolin; Particle size

Funding

  1. Key Research and Development Project of Liaoning [2020JH1/10300005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774066]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2001024]
  4. Innovation Program for College Students, Northeastern University [210069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that adding 5 wt% of super-fine metakaolin can significantly promote binder hydration, increase early compressive strength, and improve the microstructure of CPB samples. The modified binder also exhibits good environmental friendliness and cost performance.
High-volume fly ash (FA) cement presented a slow setting and lower early compressive strength, restricting the utilization in cemented paste backfill (CPB). The present work investigated the feasibility of using metakaolin with various particle sizes and content to modify the properties of FA cement. Reaction kinetics, rheological properties, setting time, compressive strength, hydration products, and the CPB samples' microstructure were thoroughly studied. The results showed that 5 wt% of super-fine metakaolin (SMK) could strongly promote the binder hydration, leading to the formation of a more compact matrix with higher early compressive strength. The 3 d-compressive strength of the CPB samples was increased by around 216% after replaced by 5 wt% of SMK. Besides, the binder doped with 5 wt% SMK showed better environmental and cost performance. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available