4.6 Review

Use of opioids for refractory dyspnoea in hospitalised patients with serious illness: a narrative review

Journal

POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 99, Issue 1169, Pages 139-144

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140915

Keywords

general medicine; respiratory medicine; palliative care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Refractory dyspnoea is a challenging symptom, and access to palliative care specialists may be limited. Opioids are a safe and recommended pharmacological intervention, despite concerns about regulation and adverse effects. Current evidence suggests low rates of severe adverse effects when opioids are used for refractory dyspnoea, making them a valuable option for palliation, particularly in a hospital setting.
Refractory dyspnoea can be a challenging symptom to manage. Palliative care specialists are not always available for consultation, and while many clinicians may undergo training in palliative care, this education is not universal. Opioids are the most studied and prescribed pharmacological intervention for refractory dyspnoea; however, many clinicians hesitate to prescribe opioids due to regulatory concerns and fear of adverse effects. Current evidence suggests that rates of severe adverse effects, including respiratory depression and hypotension, are low when opioids are administered for refractory dyspnoea. Therefore, systemic, short-acting opioids are a recommended and safe option for the palliation of refractory dyspnoea in patients with serious illness, especially in a hospital setting that facilitates close observation. In this narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiology of dyspnoea; facilitate an evidence-based discussion on the concerns, considerations and complications associated with opioid administration for refractory dyspnoea; and describe one approach to managing refractory dyspnoea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available