4.4 Article

Measuring the impact of burn scarring on health-related quality of life: Development and preliminary content validation of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) for children and adults

Journal

BURNS
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 1405-1419

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.021

Keywords

Cicatrix; Hypertrophic; Outcome assessment; Quality of life; Patient reported outcomes; Health and wellbeing; Burns

Funding

  1. Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute
  2. Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service
  3. Queensland Health, Health Practitioner Research Scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: No burn-scar specific, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure exists. This study aimed to develop a patient-reported, evaluative HRQOL measure to assess the impact of burn scarring in children and adults. Method: Semi-structured interviews, content validation surveys, and cognitive interviews were used to develop and test content validity of a new measure - the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP). Results: Participants comprised Australian adults (n = 23) and children (n = 19) with burn scarring; caregivers of children with burn scarring (n = 28); and international scar management experts (n = 14). Items distinct from other burn scar measures emerged. Four versions of the BBSIP were developed; one for children aged 8-18 years, one for adults, one for caregivers (as proxies for children aged less than 8-years), and one for caregivers of children aged 8-18 years. Preliminary content validity of the BBSIP was supported. Final items covered physical and sensory symptoms; emotional reactions; impact on social functioning and daily activities; impact of treatment; and environmental factors. Conclusion: The BBSIP was developed to assess burn-scar specific HRQOL and will be available at http://www.coolburns.com.au under a creative commons license. Further testing is underway. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available