4.5 Article

Syntheses and crystal structures of Ni(II) complexes with pyridine-based macrocyclic ligands

Journal

POLYHEDRON
Volume 211, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2021.115552

Keywords

Piperazine; Pyridine; Macrocyclic ligand; Octahedral nickel(II) complex

Funding

  1. Palacky University Olomouc project [IGA_PrF_2020_016, IGA_PrF_2021_009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three pyridine-based macrocyclic ligands with different sizes of macrocycles were synthesized and studied, along with their Ni(II) complexes, all showing a six-coordinate geometry, with the electrochemical properties in good agreement with theoretical values.
Three pyridine-based macrocyclic ligands, two containing one pyridine pendant arm (L-1 and L-2) and one containing piperazine rings in the macrocyclic scaffold (L-3), with an increasing size of the macrocycle from 12-, 14- to 30-membered ring for L-1-L-3 were synthesized and characterized. A series of Ni(II) complexes with all these ligands, with molecular formulas [NiL1(CH3OH)](ClO4)(2) (1), [NiL2(CH3CN)](ClO4)(2) (2), and [Ni2L3(DMF)(2)(CH3CN)(2)](ClO4)(4) (3) (DMF = N,N-dimethylformamide), was prepared and thoroughly characterized. Single crystal X-ray structural analysis confirmed that all the complexes have a coordination number of six and their geometries are close to octahedral. In the case of the mononuclear complexes 1 and 2, all the nitrogen atoms of the macrocycle are coordinated, however, in the dinuclear complex 3 with the piperazine-based ligand L-3, two nitrogen donor atoms (of the total number of ten) are uncoordinated. The first coordination spheres of all the complexes are completed by solvent molecules. The values of effective magnetic moments, determined by the Evans method in solution, are 3.12, 3.19 and 4.36 mu(B) for complexes 1, 2 and 3, respectively, which correspond well to the theoretical spin-only values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available