4.3 Article

Biodeterioration of Antarctic fossil penguin bones caused by lichens from the Eocene La Meseta Formation

Journal

POLAR BIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 2243-2254

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-021-02957-7

Keywords

Taphonomy; Weathering; Traces; Fossil penguins; Bones; Endolithic

Funding

  1. ANPCyT [PICT 2017-0043, UNLP N955]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lichens cause biodeterioration on fossil remains in Antarctica, with euendolithic lichens Lecidea andersonii and Athallia holocarpa identified growing on penguin bones. Bioerosive damage was evaluated using light and electron microscopic techniques, with hyphae extending up to a maximum depth of 2.5 mm inside the bones. This research provides a tool for reconstructing the chronology of taphonomic events and describing the extent of damage in the bones.
A large part of the Antarctic surface is covered by lichens since they can withstand extreme environmental conditions. Lichens are primary colonizers and contribute to soil formation by deteriorating rocks through a combination of chemical and physical mechanisms. Therefore, fossil remains found exposed on the surface are usually colonized by epilithic and endolithic lichens. The objective of this work is to determine the biodeterioration generated by lichens on fossil remains and its taphonomic implications. We identified the presence of the euendolithic lichens Lecidea andersonii and Athallia holocarpa growing into fossil penguin bones from Antarctica. The bioerosive damage was evaluated using light and electron microscopic techniques. Pits corresponding to apothecium and sinuous thin fissures remodeled, or in some cases produced, by hyphae were distinguished from the cracks originating from physical weathering. The maximum depth that hyphae extend inside the bone, probably constrained by the light supply, was established to be 2.5 mm. We provided a tool for the reconstruction of the chronology of the taphonomic events, describing the type and magnitude of the damage into the bones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available