4.3 Article

Octopuses and drilling snails as the main suspects of predation traces on shelled molluscs in West Antarctica

Journal

POLAR BIOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 127-141

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-021-02975-5

Keywords

South Shetland Islands; Drilling gastropods; Octopuses; Durophagous predation; Bottom benthic communities

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET) [Project-PIP-114-20110100238]
  2. Instituto Antartico Argentino (IAA)
  3. Direccion Nacional del Antartico (DNA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analysis of predation traces on shelled taxa is important in studying predator-prey interactions in ecosystems. Studies on predation traces on shelled taxa in Antarctica are scarce, with existing research mainly based on fossil remains. Research shows that predators exhibit site selectivity in predation traces on bivalves in West Antarctica.
The analysis of predation traces on shelled taxa is a primary source of data for studying predator-prey interactions in both modern and past ecosystems, and provides valuable information along ecological and evolutionary timescales. For Antarctica, there is little information about predation traces on shelled taxa, and the available studies come almost entirely from fossil remains. We examined traces (holes and cracks) attributed to different predators on mollusc shells from bottom benthic communities at 15 stations in West Antarctica, at depths between 71.5 and 754 m. Based on 72 shells with signs of predation, we recognized three different patterns: one produced by drilling gastropods (most probably naticids), and two others interpreted as caused by octopuses. Our results indicate that predation traces on bivalves, which were the most common prey, are nonrandomly distributed, suggesting site selectivity by predators. Future work on predation traces by durophages on shelled Antarctic molluscs is still a pending and necessary issue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available