4.6 Article

Process evaluation of a pre-adolescent transdisciplinary health intervention for inter-generational outcomes

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261632

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fogarty
  2. NIAID, the UNC-Wits AIDS Implementation Science and Cohort Analyses Training Grant [5D43TW009774-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found variations between school contexts, with high student penetration (97.2%) but lower student and parent exposure (44.3% and 55.5%, respectively). Educators believed the intervention was suitable for both rural and urban schools, different socio-economic groups, and diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds. They perceived the intervention as sustainable and recommended its adoption into the school curriculum and scaling up if proven effective.
Background The CIrCLE of Life Initiative was implemented to 537 grade 6 learners and their parents, in five Government-run South African primary schools. The transdisciplinary intervention was intended to increase knowledge and skills on HIV and obesity. The study aim was to assess and report on the implementation process. Methods Data was collected on an adapted Proctor's taxonomy of implementation outcomes, and to assess participants' experiences. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through educator logbooks, researcher observations, and learner-parent workbooks. Results Differentiations between the various school contexts were observed. The process evaluation revealed high learner penetration (97.2%), but lower learner and parent exposure (44.3% and 55.5%, respectively). All educators thought that the intervention was a fit for both rural and urban schools, different socio-economic groups, and people of different ethnic and cultural backgrounds. The intervention was perceived to be sustainable, and there were recommendations for adoption into the school curriculum and scale-up if found to be effective. Conclusion The process evaluation facilitated the assessment of the implementation outcomes, described its processes, and acknowledged fundamental characteristics that could justify variability in the intervention impact and outcomes. The value of process evaluations and their benefit to the science of implementation were demonstrated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available