4.6 Article

Health complexity assessment in primary care: A validity and feasibility study of the INTERMED tool

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263702

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement - Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Foundation for Support to Teaching, Research and Assistance at Clinics Hospital of Ribeirao Preto Medical School of University of Sao Paulo - Brazil (FAEPA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the validity and feasibility of using the INTERMED assessment tool to assess health complexity in a primary health care (PHC) population. The results showed that INTERMED had moderate correlations with quality of life, anxiety and depression symptoms, and social support. It also demonstrated good internal consistency and had a short application time.
Background Health complexity includes biological, psychological, social, and health systems. Having complex health needs is associated with poorer clinical outcomes and higher healthcare costs. Care management for people with health complexity is increasingly recommended in primary health care (PHC). The INTERMED complexity assessment grid showed adequate psychometric properties in specialized settings. This study aimed to evaluate INTERMED's validity and feasibility to assess health complexity in an adult PHC population. Method The biopsychosocial health care needs of 230 consecutive adult patients from three Brazilian PHC services were assessed using the INTERMED interview. Participants with a total score >20 were classified as complex. Quality of life was measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life BREF (WHOQOL-BREF); symptoms of anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); social support using the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS); comorbidity levels using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We developed two questionnaires to evaluate health services use, and patient perceived feasibility of INTERMED. Results 42 participants (18.3%) were classified as complex. A moderate correlation was found between the total INTERMED score and the total scores of WHOQOL-BREF (rho = - 0.59) and HADS (rho = 0.56), and between the social domains of INTERMED and MOS-SSS (rho = -0.44). After adjustment, the use of PHC (beta = 2.12, t = 2.10, p < 0.05), any other health care services (beta = 3.05, t = 3.97, p < 0.01), and any medication (beta = 3.64, t = 4.16, p < 0.01) were associated with higher INTERMED scores. The INTERMED internal consistency was good (omega = 0.83), and the median application time was 7 min. Patients reported satisfaction with the questions, answers, and application time. Conclusion INTERMED displayed good psychometric values in a PHC population and proved promising for practical use in PHC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available