4.6 Article

Twitter and Facebook posts about COVID-19 are less likely to spread misinformation compared to other health topics

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261768

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. [R01GM114771]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

COVID-19 pandemic has led to widespread attention on potential health misinformation. A study found that during the early stages of the pandemic, social media contained proportionally less misinformation than expected based on the previous year. However, health misinformation is not unique to COVID-19 and is a systemic feature of online health communication that can negatively impact public health behaviors.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought widespread attention to an infodemic of potential health misinformation. This claim has not been assessed based on evidence. We evaluated if health misinformation became more common during the pandemic. We gathered about 325 million posts sharing URLs from Twitter and Facebook during the beginning of the pandemic (March 8-May 1, 2020) compared to the same period in 2019. We relied on source credibility as an accepted proxy for misinformation across this database. Human annotators also coded a subsample of 3000 posts with URLs for misinformation. Posts about COVID-19 were 0.37 times as likely to link to not credible sources and 1.13 times more likely to link to more credible sources than prior to the pandemic. Posts linking to not credible sources were 3.67 times more likely to include misinformation compared to posts from more credible sources. Thus, during the earliest stages of the pandemic, when claims of an infodemic emerged, social media contained proportionally less misinformation than expected based on the prior year. Our results suggest that widespread health misinformation is not unique to COVID-19. Rather, it is a systemic feature of online health communication that can adversely impact public health behaviors and must therefore be addressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available