Stakeholder theory and management: Understanding longitudinal collaboration networks

This paper explores the evolution of research collaboration networks in the 'stakeholder theory and management' (STM) discipline and identifies the longitudinal effect of co-authorship networks on research performance, i.e., research productivity and citation counts. Research articles totaling 6,127 records from 1989 to 2020 were harvested from the Web of Science Database and transformed into bibliometric data using Bibexcel, followed by applying social network analysis to compare and analyze scientific collaboration networks at the author, institution and country levels. This work maps the structure of these networks across three consecutive sub-periods (t(1): 1989-1999; t(2): 2000-2010; t(3): 2011-2020) and explores the association between authors' social network properties and their research performance. The results show that authors collaboration network was fragmented all through the periods, however, with an increase in the number and size of cliques. Similar results were observed in the institutional collaboration network but with less fragmentation between institutions reflected by the increase in network density as time passed. The international collaboration had evolved from an uncondensed, fragmented and highly centralized network, to a highly dense and less fragmented network in t(3). Moreover, a positive association was reported between authors' research performance and centrality and structural hole measures in t(3) as opposed to ego-density, constraint and tie strength in t(1). The findings can be used by policy makers to improve collaboration and develop research programs that can enhance several scientific fields. Central authors identified in the networks are better positioned to receive government funding, maximize research outputs and improve research community reputation. Viewed from a network's perspective, scientists can understand how collaborative relationships influence research performance and consider where to invest their decision and choices.

Automated summary

This paper explores the evolution of research collaboration networks in the 'stakeholder theory and management' discipline and identifies the longitudinal effect of co-authorship networks on research performance. The results show that authors, institutions, and international collaboration networks have different characteristics and changes over time. Authors' social network properties are positively associated with their research performance.