4.6 Review

Financial stress and depression in adults: A systematic review

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264041

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a systematic review of 40 observational studies examining the relationship between financial stress and depression. The majority of the reviewed studies indicate a positive association between financial stress and depression, particularly among individuals with low income or wealth. In addition to social causation, psychological stress and social selection are also potential explanations for the effects of financial stress on depression. Longitudinal research is needed to further investigate the causal relationship and mechanisms linking different dimensions of financial stress and depression.
Financial stress has been proposed as an economic determinant of depression. However, there is little systematic analysis of different dimensions of financial stress and their association with depression. This paper reports a systematic review of 40 observational studies quantifying the relationship between various measures of financial stress and depression outcomes in adults. Most of the reviewed studies show that financial stress is positively associated with depression. A positive association between financial stress and depression is found in both high-income and low-and middle-income countries, but is generally stronger among populations with low income or wealth. In addition to the social causation pathway, other pathways such as psychological stress and social selection can also explain the effects of financial stress on depression. More longitudinal research would be useful to investigate the causal relationship and mechanisms linking different dimensions of financial stress and depression. Furthermore, exploration of effects in subgroups could help target interventions to break the cycle of financial stress and depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available