4.6 Article

Barriers and facilitators to qualitative data sharing in the United States: A survey of qualitative researchers

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261719

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) [R01HG009351]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR002345]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Qualitative health data sharing is rare in the U.S., with main barriers being lack of participant permission, data sensitivity, and breach of trust. Researchers are more willing to share if participants agree and sharing can increase societal impact of their research. Key resources to increase willingness to share include funding, guidance, and de-identification assistance.
Qualitative health data are rarely shared in the United States (U.S.). This is unfortunate because gathering qualitative data is labor and time-intensive, and data sharing enables secondary research, training, and transparency. A new U.S. federal policy mandates data sharing by 2023, and is agnostic to data type. We surveyed U.S. qualitative researchers (N = 425) on the barriers and facilitators of sharing qualitative health or sensitive research data. Most researchers (96%) have never shared qualitative data in a repository. Primary concerns were lack of participant permission to share data, data sensitivity, and breaching trust. Researcher willingness to share would increase if participants agreed and if sharing increased the societal impact of their research. Key resources to increase willingness to share were funding, guidance, and de-identification assistance. Public health and biomedical researchers were most willing to share. Qualitative researchers need to prepare for this new reality as sharing qualitative data requires unique considerations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available