4.3 Article

Microwave absorption analysis of graphene-based hybrid nanocomposites: experimental, numerical and component level testing studies

Journal

PLASTICS RUBBER AND COMPOSITES
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 129-144

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14658011.2021.2021839

Keywords

Radar absorbing materials (RAM); radar absorbing structures (RAS); experimental; EM shielding effectiveness; reflection loss; COMSOL software

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An effective nanocomposite-based microwave absorber made of polyurethane/graphene/glass/epoxy with different weight percentages of graphene (0 to 2.5 wt%) is proposed. Experimental investigation and numerical modeling are conducted to analyze the performance of the absorber. The experimental results show that the absorber has over 90% absorption capability in a broad bandwidth, with maximum reflection loss occurring at 12.1 GHz.
An effective nanocomposite-based microwave absorber made of polyurethane /graphene/glass/epoxy with different weight percentages of graphene (0 to 2.5 wt%) is proposed. Microstructural characterization of samples is done with the help of XRD, FESEM and TEM. Graphene crystalline structure maximum diffraction peak is observed at 26o associated interlayer d-spacing is 0.341 nm (plane 002), the same affirmed with TEM analysis. Graphene flake structure is identified from FESEM results. Firstly, experimental investigation is done using wave guide setup, later numerical model is developed using RF module in COMSOL. The experimental results reveal more than 90% absorption capability in broad bandwidth i.e., 3 GHz and maximum Reflection loss -35.9 dB is attained at 12.1 GHz. Also, maximum shielding effectiveness is -47 dB for 2.5 wt% PU/graphene composite due to its semi conduction. Further, a composite concrete block using 2.5 wt% PU/graphene is analysed using numerical model for the application of anechoic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available