4.7 Article

Pre-treated mealworm larvae and silkworm pupae as a novel protein ingredient in emulsion sausages

Journal

INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages 116-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.09.023

Keywords

Edible insect; Emulsion sausage; Mealworm; Novel protein; Silkworm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of adding pre-treated mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor) and silkworm pupae (Bombyx mori) flours on nutritional, physicochemical and textural properties of emulsion sausages. Whole freeze-dried insects were sequentially ground, defatted, and acid-hydrolyzed. Control sausage was formulated with 60% lean pork, 20% ice and 20% back fat, and insect treatments were prepared with replacement of 10% lean pork by each pre-treated insect flour. Defatting and/or acid hydrolysis significantly increased the-protein content of two insect flours, but acid hydrolysis slightly decreased protein solubility (P = 0.002). The addition of pre-treated insect flours had no impact on protein solubility of emulsion sausages, but increased cooking yield and hardness in a similar extent, regardless of pre-treating methods and insect types (P > 0.05). Our results suggest that through separation processing, mealworm larvae and silkworm pupae can be further optimized as a novel protein ingredient for emulsified meat products. Industrial Relevance: This study evaluated the nutritional and technological properties of pre-treated edible insects as a novel non-meat ingredient for the meat emulsion application. The results of the present study suggest that edible insect proteins can be practically utilized as a non-meat food ingredient in processed meat products or potentially other food applications without compromising the nutritional and technological properties of the products. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available