4.7 Article

Stover return and nitrogen application affect soil organic carbon and nitrogen in a double-season maize field

Journal

PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 387-395

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/plb.13370

Keywords

maize; microbial biomass; nitrogen; soil organic carbon; stover return

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31760354]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province [2019GXNSFAA185028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cultivation techniques, such as stover return and nitrogen application rate, have significant impacts on soil organic carbon, nutrient levels, and maize yield. The combination of stover return with 250 kg ha(-1) nitrogen application rate showed the highest levels of soil organic carbon composition, nutrient content, and maize yield in subtropical regions.
Cultivation techniques have an important influence on grain yield of maize. This experiment investigated the effect of stover return (SR) and different nitrogen (N) application rate on soil organic carbon (SOC) composition, soil nutrient and maize yield. Different nitrogen application rate 100 (N100), 150 (N150), 200 (N200), 250 (N250) or 300 (N300) kg ha(-1) applied to the maize field with stover return and without stover return traditional planting (TP) method. Nitrogen application rate and stover return affected the SOC, labile organic carbon (LOC), microbial biomass (MBC), NO3--N, NH4+-N and maize yield. Soil N, soil carbon content and maize yield of SR were all higher than TP. The SOC content of SR and TP were 9.67 and 9.19 g kg(-1), respectively. Nitrogen application was significantly and positively correlated with soil MBC, LOC, SOC, NO3--N, NH4+-N and yield. The maximum values of SOC composition, soil nutrients and maize yield were reached at SR with 250 kg ha(-1). Stover return with application of N 250 kg ha(-1) significantly increased the growth attribute and maize yield in subtropical region compared with traditional planting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available