4.5 Article

Molecular characterization of biphenotypic epithelioid and plexiform melanoma with deep penetrating nevus-like features

Journal

PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 229-237

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.13017

Keywords

deep penetrating nevus; epithelial-mesenchimal transition; heterogeneity; melanoma; receptor tyrosine kinases

Funding

  1. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology/Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor heterogeneity is a characteristic of melanoma due to high mutation burden and immunogenicity. Understanding this can aid in developing predictive biomarkers and targeted therapies. In a case of melanoma, a dual phenotype was observed with shared mutations but distinct gene expression between different histologies.
Tumor heterogeneity is a relevant hallmark of melanoma due to the high mutation burden and immunogenicity commonly encountered. Heterogeneity at the histologic level frequently corresponds to heterogeneity at the molecular level. A better understanding of this feature of malignancy can help refine the development of predictive biomarkers and to define more effective targeted therapies. Here, we describe a case of melanoma displaying a dual phenotype: a DPN-like/plexiform portion in conjunction with a conventional epithelioid morphology. Molecular studies revealed shared BRAF and PTEN mutations in both components but a CTNNB1 mutation was exclusively found in the DPN-like area of the tumor, consistent with the distinct morphology observed. There was considerable heterogeneity in sequence variants identified in the two regions. Gene expression analysis highlighted differentially regulated genes between the two histologies, including a relevant cluster of genes in the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family and related signaling pathways upregulated in the DPN-like/plexiform area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available