4.5 Article

An Integrated Approach for Synonymization of Rotylenchus rhomboides with R. goodeyi (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) Reveals High Intraspecific Mitogenomic Variation

Journal

PHYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages 1152-1164

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-21-0363-R

Keywords

genomics; microbe-genome sequencing; molecular; nematodes

Categories

Funding

  1. Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds [BOF01D05918]
  2. National Science Centre (Poland) [2019/03/X/NZ8/00220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study carried out a morphological and molecular analysis of three populations of Rotylenchus goodeyi, revealing important character variations within this species and suggesting the synonymization of R. rhomboides with R. goodeyi. The study also identified high nucleotide variation within cox1 gene sequences in these populations.
Rotylenchus is a widely distributed, economically important plant-parasitic nematode group whose species-level identification relies largely on limited morphological characters, including character-based tabular keys and molecular data of ribosomal and mitochondrial genes. In this study, a combined morphological and molecular analysis of three populations of Rotylenchus goodeyi from Belgium, Poland, and the Netherlands revealed important character variations of this species, leading to synonymization of R. rhomboides with R. goodeyi and a high nucleotide variation within cox1 gene sequences in these populations. Additional Illumina sequencing of DNA from individuals of the Dutch population revealed two variants of mitogenomes, each approximately 23 Kb in size, differing by approximately 9% and containing 11 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal RNA genes, and as many as 29 transfer RNA genes. In addition to the first representative whole-genome shotgun sequence datasets of the genus Rotylenchus, this study also provides the full-length mitogenome and the ribosomal DNA sequences of R. goodeyi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available