Journal
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0079978
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Program for the Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion, Hellenic Republic
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper responds to a previous study by V. D. Pustovitov and provides detailed derivations of the proofs of the Resistive-Wall-Mode theorem by Pfirsch and Tasso, highlighting the overlooked issues of self-adjointness and the self-adjointness of the force operator.
In a previous paper by V. D. Pustovitov [Phys. Plasmas 24, 112513 (2017)], it is claimed that the proofs of the Resistive-Wall-Mode theorem by Pfirsch and Tasso [Nucl. Fusion 11, 259 (1971)] and extensions of that theorem for time dependent wall resistivity and equilibrium plasma flow are not detailed and that there are limitations restricting their applicability. In response, we provide here pertinent detailed derivations, showing that the proofs of the above-mentioned theorems are rigorous and complete, unlike the considerations of V. D. Pustovitov [Phys. Plasmas 24, 112513 (2017)], which ignore the self-adjointness of the operator backward difference x backward difference x and the fact that the force operator in the linearized ideal MHD momentum equation remains self-adjoint in the presence of equilibrium flows.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available