4.7 Article

A new method of predicting network fracture conductivity based on the similitude principle of water and electricity

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 33, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0073291

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804042]
  2. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources (Yangtze University)
  3. Ministry of Education [PI2021-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new method of calculating network fracture conductivity based on electrical similitude principle and experimental data. The accuracy of this method is verified through comparison of experimental and prediction data, providing a reference for the optimization of fracture network conductivity in shale reservoir multi-staged fracturing.
The conductivity of network fracture is a key factor that affects horizontal well production, but using conductivity cells or modified conductivity cells to test it is uncommon. Several theoretical and empirical models have been developed to estimate network fracture conductivity. This paper develops a new method of calculating network fracture conductivity based on the electrical similitude principle and experimental data. Taking into account the network fracture type, test fluid type, proppant combination ratio, and propped type, an experimental scheme is designed, and a series of network fracture conductivities are obtained indoors. Using the formula for seepage resistance R and a calculation procedure chart, the equivalent conductivity of the 20 & DEG;, 30 & DEG;, 45 & DEG;, 60 & DEG;, and 90 & DEG; types of network fractures are compared between test data and predictions. Comparisons of our experimental data to the prediction data indicate little error, verifying the accuracy of the new method. This predicting method can provide a reference for the fracture network conductivity optimization of shale reservoir multi-staged fracturing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available