4.7 Article

Characterization of vortical structures in a stirred tank

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0083843

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway (RCN) [274398]
  2. Sigma2 [NN9771K]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data obtained from large eddy simulations were used to identify and characterize vortical structures in a baffled stirred tank reactor. Statistical analyses were performed to understand the size, shape, distribution and organization of the vortices, as well as their correlation with turbulence and blade passage. The influence of rotational speed and fluid rheology on the turbulent flow was also explored, along with potential implications for liquid-liquid and gas-liquid dispersed systems.
Data obtained from large eddy simulations of single-phase, turbulent flow of Newtonian and shear-thinning fluids in a baffled stirred tank reactor are considered to identify and characterize vortical structures. The identification proceeds through an objectivized Eulerian method, accounting for the inhomogeneities in the flow, which palliates some shortcomings of previous implementations. The characterization focuses on turbulent vortices larger than the dissipative scales and, to a lesser extent, on trailing and macro-instability vortices. The characterization performed through different statistical analyses includes aspects such as size, number density, shape, distribution and organization in space, and correlation with the kinetic energy due to turbulence and the periodic passage of the blades. To the authors' knowledge, some of these representative aspects have been rarely investigated or have not been addressed at all for the turbulent flow in a stirred vessel. The influence of changing the rotational speed of the tank and the rheology of the working fluid are explored as well. Finally, considering one-way coupling, some potential and practical implications for liquid-liquid and gas-liquid dispersed systems are briefly discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available