4.7 Article

Study on the rheology of a dilute emulsion of surfactant-covered droplets using the level set and closest point methods

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 33, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0064729

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Brazilian funding agency CNPq (Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation of Brazil) [303835/2018-4]
  2. Instituto Federal de Goias

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work investigates the effects of surfactant elasticity, coverage factor, and Peclet number on droplet shape and emulsion rheology. The study shows that surfactant elasticity and coverage factor have a more intense impact on droplet shape, while Peclet number directly affects the bulk viscosity of the emulsion, demonstrating a compensatory mechanism in viscosity changes with coverage factor.
In this work, we study the effects of surfactant elasticity (E), coverage factor (X), and Peclet number (Pe) on the droplet shape and emulsion rheology. Our analysis considers a single two-dimensional surfactant-covered droplet in an immiscible liquid submitted to a simple shear flow. The numerical methodology combines the level set, to capture the interface, and the closest point method to solve the surfactant transport equation. We separate the dilute phase contribution to the bulk stress tensor in the capillary stress, associated with the normal stress jump, and the Marangoni stress, related to the stress tangent to the interface. Our results show that E and X affect the droplet shape more intensely than the Pe. On the other hand, Pe directly affects the emulsion's bulk viscosity. For Pe >> 1, the capillary viscosity decreases with X, while the Marangoni viscosity grows with X. Such a compensation mechanism allows the increase in the bulk viscosity with X. We also present results for the first normal stress difference. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available