4.7 Article

Gluon gravitational form factors at large momentum transfer

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 823, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136751

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12075299, 11821505, 11935017]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB34000000]
  4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboraory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, perturbative QCD analysis was conducted on the gluonic gravitational form factors (GFFs) of the proton and pion at large momentum transfer, revealing scaling behavior with respect to the momentum transfer. The explicit factorization formula of the GFFs in terms of distribution amplitudes of hadrons was derived, offering a unique perspective on the momentum dependence of the GFFs and improving understanding of the internal pressure distributions of hadrons.
We perform a perturbative QCD analysis of the gluonic gravitational form factors (GFFs) of the proton and pion at large momentum transfer. We derive the explicit factorization formula of the GFFs in terms of the distribution amplitudes of hadrons. At the leading power, we find that the gluon GFFs A(g) and C-g scale as A(g)(pi) (t) = C-g(pi) (t) similar to 1/(-t) for pion, A(g)(p)(t) similar to 1/(-t)(2) and C-g(p)(t) similar to ln(2)(-t/Delta(2))/(-t)(3) for proton, respectively, where t is the momentum transfer and Delta a non-perturbative scale to regulate the endpoint singularity in C-g(p) calculation. Our results provide a unique perspective of the momentum dependence of the GFFs and will help to improve our understanding of the internal pressure distributions of hadrons. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available