4.2 Article

Relationship between lower limb EMG activity and knee frontal plane projection angle during a single-legged drop jump

Journal

PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 13-20

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.07.007

Keywords

Gluteal muscles; Hamstrings muscles; Knee valgus; Muscle activity; Knee biomechanics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to assess the relationship between lower limb muscle activity and knee kinematics during a single-legged drop jump. Results showed significant correlations between gluteal and hamstring muscle activity and knee frontal plane projection angle, indicating the importance of considering these muscles in rehabilitation or injury prevention programs.
Objectives: To assess a relationship between lower limb muscle activity and the frontal plane knee ki-nematics during a single-legged drop jump. Design: Correlation study; Setting: Functional Anatomy Laboratory. Participants: 35 healthy collegiate male athletes. Main outcome measures: Muscle activity (%MVIC) of gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, vastus medialis quadriceps, vastus lateralis quadriceps, medial gastrocnemius and lateral gastrocnemius; peak knee frontal plane projection angle; and Pearson's correlation coefficients between muscle activity and peak knee frontal plane projection angle. All outcomes were assessed for both dominant and non-dominant limbs. Results: Significant correlations (r = 0.46-0.60, P < 0.05) were found between the muscle activities of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, biceps femoris, and semitendinosus, when compared to the knee frontal plane projection angle. Conclusion: Gluteal muscles and hamstring muscles are associated with the peak knee frontal plane projection angle during a single-legged drop jump test. Thus, gluteal and hamstring muscle activities should be considered when developing rehabilitation or injury prevention programs. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available