4.8 Article

Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter in the 3.3-4.2 μeV Mass Range

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 127, Issue 26, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.261803

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0009800, DESC0009723, DE-SC0010296, DESC0010280, DE-SC0011665, DEFG0297ER41029, DEFG02-96ER40956, DEAC5207NA27344, DEC03-76SF00098, DESC0017987]
  2. Fermi Research Alliance, LLC (FRA) [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  3. Heising-Simons Foundation
  4. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LDRD office
  5. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory LDRD office
  6. ARC Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems [CE170100009]
  7. Dark Matter Particle Physics [CE200100008]
  8. Forrest Research Foundation
  9. JSPS [202060305]
  10. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0009800, DE-SC0011665] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our experiment reported results from a haloscope search for axion dark matter, excluding the axion-photon coupling predicted by a benchmark model. The sensitivity was achieved through the use of a large-volume cavity, a superconducting magnet, an ultra low noise Josephson parametric amplifier, and subKelvin temperatures. The validity of the detection procedure was ensured by injecting and detecting blind synthetic axion signals.
We report the results from a haloscope search for axion dark matter in the 3.3-4.2 mu eV mass range. This search excludes the axion-photon coupling predicted by one of the benchmark models of invisible axion dark matter, the Kim-Shifman-Vainshtein-Zakharov model. This sensitivity is achieved using a largevolume cavity, a superconducting magnet, an ultra low noise Josephson parametric amplifier, and subKelvin temperatures. The validity of our detection procedure is ensured by injecting and detecting blind synthetic axion signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available