4.6 Article

Revisiting the plasmon radiation damping of gold nanorods

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 4131-4135

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp05235g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62105229]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200875]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of The Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [20KJD150003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, gold nanorods were used as the model system to investigate the radiation damping properties of noble metal nanoparticles. Theoretical and experimental methods were employed, and it was found that radiation damping of the nanorods can be accurately described by a simple analytical equation. This research provides insights for designing and optimizing gold nanostructures with higher optical signal and better sensing performance.
Noble metal nanoparticles have been utilized for a vast amount of optical applications. For applications that use metal nanoparticles as nanosensors and for optical labeling, higher radiative efficiency is preferred. To get a deeper knowledge about the radiation damping of noble metal nanoparticles, we used gold nanorods with different geometry factors (aspect ratios) as the model system to study. We investigated theoretically how the radiation damping of a nanorod depends on the material, and shape of the particle. Surprisingly, a simple analytical equation describes radiation damping very accurately and allows the disentanglement of the maximal radiation damping parameter for gold nanorods with resonance energy E-res around 1.81 eV (685 nm). We found very good agreement with theoretical predictions and experimental data obtained by single-particle spectroscopy. Our results and approaches may pave the way for designing and optimizing gold nanostructures with higher optical signal and better sensing performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available