4.4 Article

Influence of Annealing and Substrate Surface Textures on the Wettability of Graphene-Coated Copper Foil

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.202100305

Keywords

crystallographic grains orientation; graphene synthesis; MD simulation; surface textures; wettability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies have shown that the wettability of graphene coatings and water droplets is influenced by wall textures and crystallographic grain orientations. By changing the annealing duration and surface textures, different wettability properties can be achieved, ranging from hydrophilic to hydrophobic.
Studies on the effect of wall textures and crystallographic grain orientations on graphene coatings and water droplets wettability are conducted. To date, there is almost no data on the effect of surface textures and high-temperature annealing on the wettability of the graphene-coated copper. It is generally accepted that the water contact angle on the graphene-coated copper with one graphene layer is approximate to 85 degrees-86 degrees. However, changing the annealing duration, and using different surface textures, it is possible to change the graphene wettability over a wide range of static droplet contact angles from 81 degrees to 96 degrees, which allows providing both hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties. With the growth of annealing duration, the average grain size increases from 0.1-1 to 10 mm and more. By changing the annealing duration and the surface roughness, it is possible to realize the grains orientation (001) and (111), as well as the simultaneous presence of different grains orientations. Molecular dynamic modeling of the influence of orientation and grain size on the wettability of the graphene coating is performed. The calculation results correspond to the experimental data on contact angles. The key factors affecting the wettability of graphene are presented and analyzed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available