4.6 Article

Structural and magnetic variations in Ba0.5Sr0.5Fe9Ce1Al2O19 hexaferrites at different sintering temperatures

Journal

PHYSICA SCRIPTA
Volume 96, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac3d4f

Keywords

M-type hexaferrites; magnetic saturation; coercivity; dislocations; sintering effects

Funding

  1. Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

M-type hexaferrites, particularly Ba0.5Sr0.5Fe9Ce1Al2O19, were synthesized and characterized structurally and magnetically in this study. The results demonstrated the successful synthesis with confirmation of morphology, pure phase formation, and specific magnetic trends with temperature variations.
M-type hexaferrites have attracted researchers due to their ordinary magnetic properties and utilization as media for magnetic recording and microwave devices. In this study, we have synthesized Ba0.5Sr0.5Fe9Ce1Al2O19 via a conventional ceramic route. The synthesized material is treated against different temperatures and investigated structurally and magnetically by using several techniques such as x-ray diffraction, Scanning electron microscopy, and VSM respectively. Morphology of samples confirms the absence of secondary phases and uniform distribution of particles. x-ray diffraction patterns confirm the formation of the pure phase of hexaferrites. Microstructural analyses show a decrease in porosity and dislocations among sintered samples. Magnetic properties for the samples show a decrease in Ms and Mr with increasing temperature from 1225 degrees C to 1310 degrees C, while coercivity shows an increase with increasing temperature and maximum coercivity is observed at 1290 degrees C. The trends and occurrences can be well-linked to the structural variations and sintering effects. The results suggest that material can be used in various magnetic applications such as Recording media, and memory devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available