4.3 Article

Response of physiological characteristics and grain yield of winter wheat varieties to long-term heat stress at anthesis

Journal

PHOTOSYNTHETICA
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 640-651

Publisher

ACAD SCIENCES CZECH REPUBLIC, INST EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
DOI: 10.32615/ps.2021.060

Keywords

antioxidants; chlorophyll fluorescence; grain filling; heat stress duration; photosynthesis; Triticum aestivum L.

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heat stress has become common in Huang-Huai-Hai plain, limiting wheat production. Heat-resistant wheat varieties showed lower yield reduction compared to heat-sensitive varieties due to higher antioxidative and photosynthetic performance.
Heat stress has become more common in recent years, limiting wheat production in Huang-Huai-Hai plain in China. To identify the effect of long-term heat stress on wheat production, two heat-resistant (JM44, JM23) and two heatsensitive (XM26, GC8901) wheat varieties were sown in heat tents and normal conditions, and heat stress (9 to 12 degrees C higher than control) was imposed for seven days at post-anthesis. All varieties under heat stress exhibited early senescence and reduced grain-filling rate, while the grain-filling period of heat-tolerant varieties was longer than that of the heat-sensitive. Furthermore, long-term heat stress significantly reduced kernel mass, grain number, harvest index, chlorophyll content, maximum quantum yield of PSII photochemistry, effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry, photosynthetic rate, and transpiration efficiency. In addition, the distribution of dry matter to vegetative organs, catalase activity, and malondialdehyde content increased. These results indicated that the lesser yield reduction of heat-resistant varieties (11-26%) than that of heat-sensitive (16-37%) is due to relatively higher antioxidative and photosynthetic performance and higher assimilation in the grain from vegetative organs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available