4.6 Review

Biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0024

Keywords

seascape genetics; seascape genomics; biophysical modelling; population genetics; dispersal

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [621-2014-5227]
  2. Swedish Research Council Formas [2015-1611, 2020-0008, ClimeMarine 2017-01949]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the use of genetic markers and biophysical models to infer dispersal. The study finds that biophysical dispersal models can explain genetic differentiation, but the realism of the model and local geomorphology and species biology also play a role. The article supports the use of a combination of both methods and provides recommendations for future studies.
Dispersal is generally difficult to directly observe. Instead, dispersal is often inferred from genetic markers and biophysical modelling where a correspondence indicates that dispersal routes and barriers explain a significant part of population genetic differentiation. Biophysical models are used for wind-driven dispersal in terrestrial environments and for propagules drifting with ocean currents in the sea. In the ocean, such seascape genetic or seascape genomic studies provide promising tools in applied sciences, as actions within management and conservation rely on an understanding of population structure, genetic diversity and presence of local adaptations, all dependent on dispersal within the metapopulation. Here, we surveyed 87 studies that combine population genetics and biophysical models of dispersal. Our aim was to understand if biophysical dispersal models can generally explain genetic differentiation. Our analysis shows that genetic differentiation and lack of genetic differentiation can often be explained by dispersal, but the realism of the biophysical model, as well as local geomorphology and species biology also play a role. The review supports the use of a combination of both methods, and we discuss our findings in terms of recommendations for future studies and pinpoint areas where further development is necessary, particularly on how to compare both approaches. This article is part of the theme issue 'Species' ranges in the face of changing environments (part I)'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available