4.6 Review

Social hierarchies and social networks in humans

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0440

Keywords

social status; social hierarchy; social networks; social capital; social dynamics

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Human Behaviour, Ecology and Culture at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social hierarchies across species are often governed by dominance relations, but in human society, social hierarchies can take different forms and are not necessarily based on dominance relations. The dynamic interplay between individual-level and meso-level properties of social networks is crucial for understanding status differentiation across groups.
Across species, social hierarchies are often governed by dominance relations. In humans, where there are multiple culturally valued axes of distinction, social hierarchies can take a variety of forms and need not rest on dominance relations. Consequently, humans navigate multiple domains of status, i.e. relative standing. Importantly, while these hierarchies may be constructed from dyadic interactions, they are often more fundamentally guided by subjective peer evaluations and group perceptions. Researchers have typically focused on the distinct elements that shape individuals' relative standing, with some emphasizing individual-level attributes and others outlining emergent macro-level structural outcomes. Here, we synthesize work across the social sciences to suggest that the dynamic interplay between individual-level and meso-level properties of the social networks in which individuals are embedded are crucial for understanding the diverse processes of status differentiation across groups. More specifically, we observe that humans not only navigate multiple social hierarchies at any given time but also simultaneously operate within multiple, overlapping social networks. There are important dynamic feedbacks between social hierarchies and the characteristics of social networks, as the types of social relationships, their structural properties, and the relative position of individuals within them both influence and are influenced by status differentiation. This article is part of the theme issue 'The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available