4.6 Review

Vocal communication across cultures: theoretical and methodological issues

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0387

Keywords

vocal communication; cross-cultural; voice modulation; evolution

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of human vocal communication has been mostly focused on WEIRD societies, but there is a growing need for cross-cultural investigations to understand how universals and cultural variations interact in vocal production and perception. However, conducting cross-cultural voice research poses methodological challenges, especially in populations that are not commonly studied in Western societies, such as rural and small-scale communities.
The study of human vocal communication has been conducted primarily in Western, educated, industrialized, rich, democratic (WEIRD) societies. Recently, cross-cultural investigations in several domains of voice research have been expanding into more diverse populations. Theoretically, it is important to understand how universals and cultural variations interact in vocal production and perception, but cross-cultural voice research presents many methodological challenges. Experimental methods typically used in WEIRD societies are often not possible to implement in many populations such as rural, small-scale societies. Moreover, theoretical and methodological issues are often unnecessarily intertwined. Here, I focus on three areas of cross-cultural voice modulation research: (i) vocal signalling of formidability and dominance, (ii) vocal emotions, and (iii) production and perception of infant-directed speech. Research in these specific areas illustrates challenges that apply more generally across the human behavioural sciences but also reveals promise as we develop our understanding of the evolution of human communication. This article is part of the theme issue 'Voice modulation: from origin and mechanism to social impact (Part II)'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available