4.3 Article

Experimental determination of effective atomic radii of constituent elements in CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy

Journal

PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE LETTERS
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 100-110

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09500839.2021.2024290

Keywords

Crmnfeconi; high-entropy alloy; effective atomic radius; lattice parameter; atomic displacement

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [19H05174]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H05174] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to understand the complex mechanism of solid-solution strengthening in high-entropy alloys (HEAs), this study evaluates the effective atomic radii of constituent elements experimentally and finds a different order compared to previous theoretical calculations. While theoretical calculations suggest a correlation between yield stress and average atomic displacement in HEAs, this correlation is not confirmed by experimental results in this study.
To elucidate the complex mechanism of solid-solution strengthening in high-entropy alloys (HEAs), it is necessary to determine the effective atomic radii of the constituent elements that are the sources of lattice strain. In the present study, the effective atomic radii of the constituent elements in CrMnFeCoNi HEA that are the basis of the atomic displacements, are evaluated from lattice parameters experimentally determined via theta-2 theta X-ray diffraction measurements. The order of the evaluated atomic radii in the present study is different from that of the atomic radii determined via ab-initio calculations in previous studies. The results of the ab-initio calculations indicate a correlation between the yield stress of and the average atomic displacement in the HEA. However, no definite correlation is confirmed by the experimental results in the present study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available