4.7 Review

Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105849

Keywords

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; Traditional Chinese medicine; Lipid metabolism; Inflammation; Fibrosis; Gut microbiota; Review

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82104746, 81974558]
  2. Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China [SZSM201612074, SZSM201612033]
  3. Shenzhen Municipal Scheme for Basic Research [JCYJ20190808144005614]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NASH is a common chronic liver disease in clinical practice with no officially approved pharmacological therapy. Traditional Chinese medicine has been proven beneficial in treating NASH in multiple studies, providing a potential therapy for this condition.
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common chronic liver disease in clinical practice. It has been considered that NASH is one of the main causes of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis and carcinoma. The mechanism of the NASH progression is complex, including lipid metabolism dysfunction, insulin resistance, oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, fibrosis and gut microbiota dysbiosis. Except for lifestyle modification and bariatric surgery, there has been no pharmacological therapy that is being officially approved in NASH treatment. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), as a conventional and effective therapeutic strategy, has been proved to be beneficial in treating NASH in numbers of studies. In the light of this, TCM may provide a potential therapy for treating NASH. In this review, we summarized the associated mechanisms of action TCM treating NASH in preclinical studies and systematically analysis the effectiveness of TCM treating NASH in current clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available