4.7 Review

Synthesized nanoparticles, biomimetic nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles for treatment of autoimmune disease: Comparison and prospect

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105833

Keywords

Autoimmune disease; Nanoparticle; Extracellular vesicle; Mesenchymal stromal cell; Immunomodulation; Immunosuppression

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [202006370067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanotechnology offers potential to improve the treatment of autoimmune diseases by reducing side effects and enhancing immunosuppressive capacity. This review discusses the properties and mechanisms of synthesized nanoparticles, biomimetic nanoparticles, and extracellular vesicles, and their immunomodulation properties. The challenges faced by these nanoparticles are also described.
An emerging strategy is needed to treat autoimmune diseases, many of which are chronic with no definitive cure. Current treatments only alleviate symptoms and have many side effects affecting patient quality of life. Recently, nanoparticle drug delivery systems, an emerging method in medicine, has been used to target cells or organs, without damaging normal tissue. This approach has led to fewer side effects, along with a strong immunosuppressive capacity. Therefore, a nanotechnology approach may help to improve the treatment of autoimmune diseases. In this review, we separated nanoparticles into three categories: synthesized nanoparticles, biomimetic nanoparticles, and extracellular vesicles. This review firstly compares the typical mechanism of action of these three nanoparticle categories respectively in terms of active targeting, camouflage effect, and similarity to parent cells. Then their immunomodulation properties are discussed. Finally, the challenges faced by all these nanoparticles are described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available