4.2 Article

Identification of sex-specific genetic associations in response to opioid analgesics in a White, non-Hispanic cohort from Southeast Minnesota

Journal

PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 117-123

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41397-022-00265-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Mayo Clinic Specialized Center of Research Excellent on Sex Differences
  2. Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine
  3. Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery
  4. National Institutes of Health [U19 GM61388, R01 GM28157, U01 HG005137, R01 GM125633, R01 AG034676, U54 AG044170, U01 HG06379]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found associations between sex-specific genetic variations and opioid response, highlighting the importance of considering gender differences in opioid response studies.
The study of sex-specific genetic associations with opioid response may improve the understanding of inter-individual variability in pain treatments. We investigated sex-specific associations between genetic variation and opioid response. We identified participants in the RIGHT Study prescribed codeine, tramadol, hydrocodone, and oxycodone between 01/01/2005 and 12/31/2017. Prescriptions were collapsed into codeine/tramadol and hydrocodone/oxycodone. Outcomes included poor pain control and adverse reactions within six weeks after prescription date. We performed gene-level and single-variant association analyses stratified by sex. We included 7169 non-Hispanic white participants and a total of 1940 common and low-frequency variants (MAF > 0.01). Common variants in MACROD2 (rs76026520), CYP1B1 (rs1056837, rs1056836), and CYP2D6 (rs35742686) were associated with outcomes. At the gene level, FAAH, SCN1A, and TYMS had associations for men and women, and NAT2, CYP3A4, CYP1A2, and SLC22A2 had associations for men only. Our findings highlight the importance of considering sex in association studies on opioid response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available