4.2 Article

A simulation-based comparison of estimation methods for adaptive and classical group sequential clinical trials

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 599-611

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pst.2188

Keywords

adaptive clinical trial; backward-image confidence interval; repeated confidence interval; sample-size reestimation; stagewise adjusted confidence interval

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Statistical methods for controlling type-I error in adaptive group sequential clinical trials are well established, but methods for obtaining statistically valid point estimates and confidence intervals are not as well understood. At the end of an adaptive trial, obtaining statistically valid point estimates and confidence intervals can be achieved through methods like the BWCI and RCI, with the BWCI providing exact coverage and the RCI providing conservative coverage.
Statistical methods for controlling the type-I error of hypothesis tests in adaptive group sequential clinical trials are well established and well understood. However, methods for obtaining statistically valid point estimates and confidence intervals for adaptive designs are not as well established or as well understood. At the end of an adaptive trial, one may calculate the repeated confidence interval (RCI), which provides conservative coverage of delta, or the backward image confidence interval (BWCI), which provides exact coverage of delta and is an extension of the stagewise adjusted confidence interval (SWCI, used in classical group sequential designs). The BWCI can also provide a median unbiased estimate (MUE) of delta. There is a need to better understand the coverage and possible biases associated with these methods. We conducted a simulation study exploring parameter estimation following sample size reestimation based on testing methods with strong control of type-I error. Generally, the BWCI provided exact coverage, the naive CI provided inconsistent coverage, and the RCI provided conservative coverage. Additionally, we note considerable asymmetry in the coverage from above/from below for the RCI, although we did not see any instance where the 95% RCI excluded the true parameter more than 2.5% on either side. At the end of an adaptive group sequential trial, we strongly recommend the use of the BWCI (and associated MUE), with the RCI computed during interim looks; the naive CI should be avoided. These results and conclusions also hold true for classical group sequential designs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available