4.5 Article

Assessment of High-Power Electronic Nicotine Delivery System as an Alternative Aerosol Device for Terbutaline Delivery

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 587-597

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-022-03187-0

Keywords

Aerosol particle size distribution; Cascade impactors; Electronic cigarette; Pharmaceutical formulation; Pulmonary delivery; Terbutaline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the performance of a new-generation high-power electronic nicotine delivery system for the administration of inhaled terbutaline. The results showed that under specific conditions, the system can deliver the same respirable dose of terbutaline and aerosol particle size distribution as a traditional jet nebulizer.
Purpose The performance of new-generation high-power electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) for the administration of inhaled terbutaline was assessed. Methods The formulation of e-liquid was carried out using terbutaline in combination with 1, 3- propanediol. Several terbutaline concentrations (from 0.3125 to 2.500 mg / mL) and power levels (from 15 to 35 W) were assessed using a box type ENDS. The respirable drug dose was determined using a Glass Twin Impinger and quantified by liquid chromatography coupled with a UV-detector. The Next Generation Impactor and the Dekati Low Pressure Impactor were used to measure the aerosol particle size distribution in drug mass. The results were compared with a jet nebulizer (Cirrus TM 2) similar to the usual clinical conditions (2 mL at [terbutaline] of 2.5 mg / mL). Results The optimal conditions to maximize terbutaline delivery using ENDS are a drug concentration at 1 mg/mL, and a power level at 30 W, to reach a respirable dose of 8.73 +/- 0.90 mu g/puff. By contrast, during a 5 min nebulization, the respirable dose of terbutaline was 1040 +/- 33 mu g whatever the cascade impactors and the aerosol devices used. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) remains similar for jet nebulizer and ENDS in the 1.74-2.07 mu m range. Conclusion Compared to the jet nebulizer, a same respirable dose of terbutaline at the same range of aerosol size distribution was delivered by ENDS if 120 puffs were performed. The ENDS can be considered as an alternative aerosol device for terbutaline delivery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available