Journal
PEDIATRICS
Volume 149, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-050996
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health Award [K23HL146841]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article discusses a conflict regarding discharge planning for a febrile infant in the emergency department. The physician believes discharge would be unsafe, while the child's mother prefers to monitor her son closely at home. Commentators assess the case from different perspectives and prioritize a high-quality informed consent process.
In this Ethics Rounds we present a conflict regarding discharge planning for a febrile infant in the emergency department. The physician believes discharge would be unsafe and would constitute a discharge against medical advice. The child's mother believes her son has been through an already extensive and painful evaluation and would prefer to monitor her well-appearing son closely at home with a safety plan and a next-day outpatient visit. Commentators assess this case from the perspective of best interest, harm-benefit, conflict management, and nondiscriminatory care principles and prioritize a high-quality informed consent process. They characterize the formalization of discharge against medical advice as problematic. Pediatricians, a pediatric resident, ethicists, an attorney, and mediator provide a range of perspectives to inform ethically justifiable options and conflict resolution practices.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available