4.3 Article

The augmented radiologist: artificial intelligence in the practice of radiology

Journal

PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 11, Pages 2074-2086

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05177-7

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Clinical decision-making; Deep learning; Pediatric radiology; Radiomics

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P-32554]
  2. Medical University of Graz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artificial intelligence in medicine, especially in radiology, shows great promise in providing more accurate results. While AI can handle large datasets and discover various variants, the key advantage of human intelligence lies in content knowledge and problem-solving abilities.
In medicine, particularly in radiology, there are great expectations in artificial intelligence (AI), which can see more than human radiologists in regard to, for example, tumor size, shape, morphology, texture and kinetics - thus enabling better care by earlier detection or more precise reports. Another point is that AI can handle large data sets in high-dimensional spaces. But it should not be forgotten that AI is only as good as the training samples available, which should ideally be numerous enough to cover all variants. On the other hand, the main feature of human intelligence is content knowledge and the ability to find near-optimal solutions. The purpose of this paper is to review the current complexity of radiology working places, to describe their advantages and shortcomings. Further, we give an AI overview of the different types and features as used so far. We also touch on the differences between AI and human intelligence in problem-solving. We present a new AI type, labeled explainable AI, which should enable a balance/cooperation between AI and human intelligence - thus bringing both worlds in compliance with legal requirements. For support of (pediatric) radiologists, we propose the creation of an AI assistant that augments radiologists and keeps their brain free for generic tasks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available