4.5 Article

Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Response to Direct-acting Antivirals Among Adolescents With HIV/HCV Coinfection: Real-world Data From Ukraine

Journal

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages 417-419

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003467

Keywords

Hepatitis C; HIV; treatment; adolescents; pediatric; direct-acting antivirals

Funding

  1. Penta Foundation
  2. ViiV Healthcare
  3. BMS (Penta Foundation)
  4. Abbvie
  5. Bristol Myers Squibb
  6. Gilead
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  8. ViiV Healthcare (Penta Foundation)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in HIV/HCV coinfected adolescents from the Ukraine Paediatric HIV Cohort Study. The results showed that DAA treatment was well tolerated and effective in these patients.
Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have been approved for treating chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in children and adolescents. Although DAAs have been used in real-world settings for the treatment of HCV monoinfected adolescents, few reports of real-world use of DAAs in children and adolescents who are coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are available. We evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of DAAs in HIV/HCV coinfected adolescents from the Ukraine Paediatric HIV Cohort Study including all those for whom treatment outcomes were available by April 2021. Overall, 6 coinfected adolescents had received DAA treatment; 4 with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV), 1 with SOF/LDV+ribavirin, and 1 with SOF/daclatasvir. No patient discontinued treatment due to adverse events and no serious adverse events were reported. All 6 patients achieved sustained virologic response by 12 weeks after the end of therapy. DAA treatment was well tolerated and effective in adolescents with HIV/HCV coinfection in a real-world setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available