4.5 Article

Comparison of Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention and Control Activities and Resources Between Low-/Middle- and High-income Countries

Journal

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
Volume 41, Issue 3S, Pages S3-S9

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003318

Keywords

antimicrobial stewardship; infection prevention; low- and middle-income countries; antimicrobial resistance

Funding

  1. Medical Research Futures Fund Australia Investigator Grant
  2. Melbourne Campus Clinician Scientist Fellowship, Melbourne, Australia
  3. Victorian government infrastructure support program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are significant differences in pediatric antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and infection prevention and control (IPC) resources between low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and high-income countries (HIC). Lack of education is the greatest barrier to AMS and IPC in both LMIC and HIC settings. International collaboration is urgently needed to address the imbalance in global AMS and IPC resource availability and activities.
Background: The growth of antimicrobial resistance worldwide has led to increased focus on antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, although primarily in high-income countries (HIC). We aimed to compare pediatric AMS and IPC resources/activities between low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and HIC and to determine the barriers and priorities for AMS and IPC in LMIC as assessed by clinicians in those settings. Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed to clinicians working in HIC and LMIC healthcare facilities in 2020. Results: Participants were from 135 healthcare settings in 39 LMIC and 27 HIC. Formal AMS and IPC programs were less frequent in LMIC than HIC settings (AMS 42% versus 76% and IPC 58% versus 89%). Only 47% of LMIC facilities conducted audits of antibiotic use for pediatric patients, with less reliable availability of World Health Organization Access list antibiotics (29% of LMIC facilities). Hand hygiene promotion was the most common IPC intervention in both LMIC and HIC settings (82% versus 91%), although LMIC hospitals had more limited access to reliable water supply for handwashing and antiseptic hand rub. The greatest perceived barrier to pediatric AMS and IPC in both LMIC and HIC was lack of education: only 17% of LMIC settings had regular/required education on antimicrobial prescribing and only 25% on IPC. Conclusions: Marked differences exist in availability of AMS and IPC resources in LMIC as compared with HIC. A collaborative international approach is urgently needed to combat antimicrobial resistance, using targeted strategies that address the imbalance in global AMS and IPC resource availability and activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available