4.0 Article

Efficacy of pediatric dermatology Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) sessions on augmenting primary care providers' confidence and abilities

Journal

PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 385-388

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pde.14907

Keywords

acne; atopic dermatitis; eczema; nevi; melanocytic; warts

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [UL1 TR002014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With a shortage of pediatric dermatologists, general pediatricians are increasingly responsible for managing pediatric dermatologic disorders. Participation in a pediatric dermatology-specific Project ECHO program has been shown to significantly increase providers' ability and confidence in managing pediatric dermatologic conditions. This educational model could potentially improve primary care providers' knowledge and management of common dermatologic disorders.
Due to the shortage of pediatric dermatologists and the abundance of skin disorders presenting in childhood, general pediatricians shoulder the management of many pediatric dermatologic disorders and would benefit from additional dermatology-specific training. To address this educational gap, general pediatricians were enrolled in a pediatric dermatology-specific Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) program and surveyed to assess the efficacy of the program in increasing providers' ability and confidence in managing pediatric dermatologic conditions. Providers unanimously reported increased confidence and abilities in assessment and management of pediatric dermatologic conditions. Pediatric dermatology Project ECHO demonstrated high efficacy in improving general practitioners' comfort and knowledge on dermatology-specific topics and may be used as an education model for enhancing primary care providers' knowledge and management of common disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available