4.5 Article

Identification of source social network of digital images using deep neural network

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 17-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2021.06.019

Keywords

Image forensics; Social network; Deep learning; Provenance inference; Source identification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identification of image provenance is crucial in image forensics, and a deep learning approach can efficiently identify the social network origin of images. The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art techniques on well-known datasets, showing promise for identifying image provenance in a new way.
Identification of image provenance is one of the crucial tasks to be tackled in the field of image forensics. Due to the rapid growth in technology, a huge amount of digital images are shared among users through social networks which facilitates many malicious activities. Establishing the provenance of downloaded images is an important task that could help focus investigations in a specific direction. Such a task is based on the identification of unique fingerprints that are imprinted on images by the social network during the process of upload and download. Based on this, we propose a deep learning based approach that learns the unique traces from the images transformed to the discrete cosine and wavelet domains, to investigate whether the image under test originates directly from a camera or from a specific social network site. The proposed method is able to efficiently identify the specific social network of provenance of the downloaded images and outperforms the state-of-the-art techniques. The encouraging results on images represented in the wavelet domain obtained for the well-known datasets, namely, VISION, IPLAB, and FODB sheds the light into a new way of identifying the image provenance. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available