4.6 Article

Automated detection of squint as a sensitive assay of sex-dependent calcitonin gene-related peptide and amylin-induced pain in mice

Journal

PAIN
Volume 163, Issue 8, Pages 1511-1519

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002537

Keywords

CGRP; Amylin; Migraine; Grimace; Nonevoked pain; Squint assay; Automated; Formalin; Sexual dimorphism

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS075599, NS113839]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs Merit Award [1I0RX002101, I01 RX003523-0]
  3. Center for Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss [VA C6810-C]
  4. Department of Defense [W81XWH-16-1-0071]
  5. Career Development Award [IK2 RX002010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed an automated scanning measurement method for quantifying pain. The method was validated for measuring responses to formalin and calcitonin gene-related peptide stimulation and demonstrated gender differences. The results suggest that the automated scanning measurement method can provide more accurate and real-time pain analysis.
We developed an automated squint assay using both black C57BL/6J and white CD1 mice to measure the interpalpebral fissure area between the upper and lower eyelids as an objective quantification of pain. The automated software detected a squint response to the commonly used nociceptive stimulus formalin in C57BL/6J mice. After this validation, we used the automated assay to detect a dose-dependent squint response to a migraine trigger, the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide, including a response in female mice at a dose below detection by the manual grimace scale. Finally, we found that the calcitonin gene-related peptide amylin induced squinting behavior in female mice, but not males. These data demonstrate that an automated squint assay can be used as an objective, real-time, continuous-scale measure of pain that provides higher precision and real-time analysis compared with manual grimace assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available