4.2 Article

Caregiver Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults

Journal

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages E191-E197

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003427

Keywords

Cochlear implant; Disease-specific quality of life; Elderly; Frailty; Frailty index; Quality of life

Funding

  1. NIA/NIH [1R03AG056458-01]
  2. American Otological Society Clinician-Scientist Grant
  3. University of Utah Study Design and Biostatistics Center
  4. National Center for Research Resources
  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [8UL1TR000105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the quality of life (QOL) of caregivers of older cochlear implant recipients. The results showed that caregiver QOL was significantly influenced by patient gender and health status, but not by patient speech recognition scores.
Objective: To evaluate factors affecting quality of life (QOL) in caregivers of older cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Academic medical center. Patients: Adults over age 65 receiving CI between July 13, 2000 and April 3, 2019. Interventions: Cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measures: Linear regression models for caregiver QOL measured by Significant Other Scale for Hearing Disability (SOS-HEAR), with independent variables: caregiver role, patient gender, 11 factor modified frailty index (mFI), duration of hearing loss, hearing aid use, age at surgery, time since surgery, change in pure tone average (PTA), processor input type and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ). Correlations between SOS-HEAR and patient speech recognition scores. Results: Questionnaires were mailed to all 294 living CI recipients. Seventy-one caregivers completed the questionnaire. Only patient gender and mFi were significant predictors of caregiver QOL on both univariate (p <= 0.001, beta= -20.26 [95% confidence interval -30.21, -10.3]; 0.005, -0.72 [-1.20, -0.23], respectively) and multivariate (p = 0.005, beta = -20.09, -33.05 to -7.13; 0.003, -0.93 [-1.50, -0.37]) analysis, where caregivers of female patients with lower mFI (better health) had better QOL scores. Caregiver QOL was significantly associated with patient's change in PTA and self-reported QOL scores on univariate (p = 0.041, beta = 0.52 [0.08, 0.96]; 0.024, -0.27 [-0.52, -0.02]) but not multivariate analysis. Time since CI was significant only on multivariate analysis (0.041, -0.17 [-0.33, -0.01]). Caregiver QOL did not correlate with patient speech recognition scores. Conclusions: Higher QOL scores were found among caregivers of healthier, female CI recipients. Patient hearing measurements did not correspond with better caregiver QOL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available